CRC32C checksum codec (version 1.0)#
Editor’s draft 17 July 2023
- Specification URI:
- Corresponding ZEP:
- Issue tracking:
- Suggest an edit for this spec:
bytes -> bytes codec that appends a CRC32C checksum of the input bytestream.
Status of this document#
Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and [RFC2119] terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.
All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example”.
The value of the
name member in the codec object MUST be
Format and algorithm#
This is a
bytes -> bytes codec.
The codec computes the CRC32C checksum as defined in [RFC3720] of the input bytestream. The output bytestream is composed of the unchanged input byte stream with the appended checksum. The checksum is represented as a 32-bit unsigned integer represented in little endian.
S. Bradner. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
J. Satran et al. Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI). April 2004. Proposed Standard. URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3720
No changes yet.